This week’s
article summary is Scientific
Evidence on How to Teach Writing is Slim.
About 30 years
ago, my wife and I tutored the same student. We’d go to his house every
Saturday, my wife working with him for an hour on math followed by me spending
time with him on writing. At the end of the two hours, we’d meet with the boy’s
mom on progress we were making with the child. My wife always had very detailed
corrections, clarifications, and adjustments she had made with him in math,
while I was pretty vague about his progress in writing, because, after all,
working a hour a week with a reluctant writer is not a recipe for rapid writing
improvement.
I didn’t know it
then, but there are two simple rules for becoming a better writer: read a lot
and write a lot.
We typically get
better at something we like to practice and care about. If you don’t like to
read, you probably don’t reach for a book in your idle time. And often, if you
don’t read, you probably don’t do much writing either.
We are halfway
done with our Embolden Your Inner Writer
course for faculty and staff. Jill, Marsha, and I designed the class with the
principal goal of making reading and writing enjoyable, meaningful, and
habitual.
When I was a
student, writing was a puzzle that I couldn’t decipher. And when I got my
compositions back from teachers, all the their markings (in blood red, of
course) made the puzzle even more confusing. (I’m hoping my English teachers
weren’t so naïve as to think I actually read and reflected on the comments they
wrote about how to improve my writing; like most other kids, I looked at the
grade, then crumbled up the composition in a ball and tossed it in the trash
can.)
Our Inner Writer course separates writing
into two distinct parts: content and craft. Our belief is too many of us grow
frustrated with writing because we jump past the content (ideas) and get overly
consumed with craft (revising and editing content).
But in reality
it’s content that’s more interesting. We all have thoughts, feelings, ideas,
and opinions; we all have stories in our lives—those that are funny, poignant,
inspirational, etc. Focusing on content during the drafting process lets us
explore ourselves; it’s fun and freeing to write more intuitively, allowing
your mind and thoughts to go in unpredictable directions. I used to think that
writing in a diary was self-indulgent, but I’m guessing there is a correlation
between those who wrote in a diary and those who are now confident writers.
Revising (is the
content of what I’ve written clear and complete?) and editing (did I follow the
standard conventions of writing?) are secondary to content. Yes, we need to get
there but too often prospective writers get bogged down, bored, and intimidated
by focusing too much on the standard rules of writing. When should I use who, when should I use whom?
In preparing for
our Inner Writer course, I read a
number of books on the writing process. My favorite was On
Writing by Stephen King, the horror writer. I was fascinated that when he writes a new novel,
he doesn’t first dutifully lay out the plot in a sequence as I assumed. Rather,
he writes based on a situation: for example, what happens if dead family pets
buried in the backyard come back to life? Then he just lets his imagination run
wild within that scenario and focuses on content, content, content. After he
completes the initial rough draft, he waits at least a month before beginning
to revise and edit.
I certainly hope
our eleven intrepid faculty and staff are seeing that writing is more about
freedom and habit than rules and structure. And I hope many more of you at some
point get to take the course with us!
But I really wish
30 years ago, I had just sat with the boy I was tutoring and talked with him
about his interests and passions and then just let him write without worry
about spelling, punctuation, etc.
Joe
---------
The poor quality of student
writing is a common lament among college professors. But how are elementary,
middle and high school teachers supposed to teach it better?
This is an area where education research doesn’t
offer educators clear advice.
“What’s very odd
about writing is how small the research base is,” said Robert Slavin, director
of the Center for Research and Reform in Education at the Johns Hopkins School
of Education. “There’s remarkably very little high-quality evidence of what works
in writing.”
Compared to
subjects such as math and reading, the amount of research on how to teach
writing is tiny. Earlier in 2019, Slavin searched for rigorous research on
teaching writing from second grade to high school. He found only 14 studies
that met their standards. By contrast, he found 69 studies just on teaching
reading to high school students.
Many popular writing programs
used in schools around the country, such as Writer’s Workshop or the Hochman Method, might both be excellent
teaching methods but there are no controlled studies of their effectiveness.
However, a large scientific study of Writer’s Workshop is underway and results
are expected in 2021.
The 14 studies looking at 12
different writing programs were described in Slavin’s 2019 review. Some focused
on explicitly teaching the writing process from planning to drafting to
revising, others emphasized working with classmates and making writing a
communal activity, and one other was to integrate reading with the writing.
It turns out all
three approaches worked some of the time but none clearly outshone the others.
One broad lesson that emerges
from the study was that students benefit from step-by-step guides to
writing in various genres. Argumentative writing, for example, is very
different from fiction writing.
Another lesson is that
students also need explicit grammar and punctuation instruction but it should
be taught in the context of their writing, not as a separate stand-alone
lesson.
“Motivation seems to be the
key,” Slavin wrote. “If students love to write, because their peers as well as
their teachers are eager to see what they have to say, then they will write
with energy and pleasure. Perhaps more than any other subject, writing demands
a supportive environment, in which students want to become better writers
because they love the opportunity to express themselves, and to interact in
writing with valued peers and teachers.”
It may be that nearly every thoughtful writing curriculum is
likely to produce results because it’s making kids write more than they
currently are. In this country, pressure to score well on reading and math
tests has pushed writing instruction down the priority list so there isn’t a
lot of time spent on writing instruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment