This week’s
article summary is The
Do's and Don'ts of Good Homework.
I liked this
article for a number of reasons.
First, I enjoyed
the summary of the past 80 years and that societal views of homework have gone
through a number of cycles.
Second, the article
is written from a middle school teacher perspective, and for us as an
elementary school knowing the tensions and debates at the next level of schooling
is valuable.
Third, the author
provides a succinct list of do’s and don’ts of homework, which aligns to
Trinity’s approach and includes some new points for
me—I especially liked her rule that homework require ‘original
thought and meaningful product’ from her students.
While Trinity as
an elementary-only school generally doesn’t get an over-abundance
of parent scrutiny regarding homework and it does seems that we are
in the beginning of a societal shift away from the perceived benefits of
homework overload, it’s clear to me that any work at home for kids has to find
that sweet spot balance of learning stuff (content) and opportunities to
think critically and creatively (doing something with that content).
Parents seem to
worry that if their children come home from school without much if any homework
they will vegetate in front of a computer screen (the latest fad being
Fortnite). I’ve suggested to parents that rather than asking their child what
they learned in school today, they should emphasize words like 'why, how, and
what else they want to know.’ To me, the best schools act as a springboard for
a child’s natural curiosity to learn more about what they
found intriguing in school.
Mix in time to
think and reflect, time to exercise the body, time to read, and time to chill
(yes, even on a computer screen) and you’ve got a great home
complement to an inspiring school day!
Joe
----
In the 1940s,
when the country was dealing with more important issues, homework was seen as a
redundant waste of time.
After Sputnik,
however, it was the way we would beat the Russians to the moon.
The resulting
backlash (post-moon landing) led to my elementary school years in the blissful
1970s when more problem solving, hands-on learning was emphasized.
After the dire “A
Nation At Risk” warnings, the emphasis was on drill and kill in the 80s and
90s.
This prepared the
way for the piling on of homework as supplemental test prep after the passage
of No Child Left Behind in the early 2000s and its even greater emphasis on
rote learning.
Many of my
colleagues would love to give less homework, but they feel that they would be
doing a disservice to the students by not sufficiently preparing them for the
next level of their education (high school), which gives significantly more
homework.
The high school
feels the pressure to give excessive homework to enable students to pass the
Advanced Placement tests and to do well on college entrance exams. Universities
see students who are “unprepared” to do the critical thinking necessary to be
successful because, sadly, they were given too much rote work at the high
school level and below. The effects of all these conflicting goals roll
downhill to educators at the middle and elementary school levels.
Although I am
thrilled with the recent trend in elementary schools (which tend to be the most
progressive level of education) – eliminating homework in response to research
– I don’t see this moving up through the grade levels any time soon.
I was in a recent
Twitter chat with other middle school educators about the topic of homework.
There was a clear division among the teachers on the question of whether
homework teaches time management and responsibility.
I fell on the
side that believes it does not. I feel that the completion of homework merely
teaches compliance.
To me, giving two
or more hours of homework after they have already spent seven hours sitting and
absorbing feels like making children clock in for a second shift.
When I do give
homework, I make every effort to make it engaging, meaningful, and brief.
Much of what I
learned about quality homework is summed up in Daniel Pink’s book, Drive,
which presents a three-part test for homework:
- Am I offering my students autonomy
over how and when to do this work?
- Does this assignment promote mastery
by offering a novel, engaging task (as opposed to rote reformulation of
something already covered in class)?
- Do my students understand the purpose
of the assignment? That is, can they see how doing this additional
activity at home contributes to the larger enterprise in which the class
is engaged?
Through all of my
research, and from trial and error in my own class, I have determined my own
set of “rules.” Following practices like these can assure we have a positive
homework policy in place.
Don’ts
- I do not use homework to introduce a
new concept.
- I never give busywork (rote
worksheets) as homework.
- I make sure that the homework I
assign is never too difficult for my students to do without assistance.
- I don’t grade homework for
correctness.
- I feel that “No Homework” passes send
the wrong message that homework is unnecessary and can be skipped.
- I don’t assign homework as students
are ready to walk out the door during the last few minutes of class. When
there is going to be some homework, I want them to begin it in class so
that I can help answer any questions or clarify directions.
Do’s
- Students are more likely to complete
assignments if they have an audience. Much of the work done in my class is
shared and/or displayed.
- For anything more complex than just
finishing a small amount of what they started in class, I give more than
one day for assignments to be completed so students may parse their time
as needed.
- I only give homework that requires
original thought and a meaningful product. Students are motivated by work
that stresses creativity and higher-order thinking skills.
- My homework is always developmentally
appropriate. For middle school students, this means taking advantage of
their desire to still have fun and see the absurd side of life, while
simultaneously using their critical thinking skills. It is also work they
are able to complete independently.
No comments:
Post a Comment