This week’s article
summary is The Talking Cure from The New
Yorker.
Last week I referenced the NPR report that the three most important variables in a child’s success in
school are 1) IQ, 2) self-control/self-discipline, and 3) parents’
socioeconomic status.
This week's article covers the
research that has been done re: parent socioeconomic status, a young child’s
exposure to vocabulary and sentence syntax, and their impact on success in
school.
Certainly there are
larger sociological issues at play here, yet the article is interesting in that
our students entering preschool at Trinity have more than likely had a myriad of experiences
and opportunities which set them up favorably for success in school.
Joe
----
Research has shown that
the poorer parents are, the less they talk to their children, and this
disparity affects children when they begin school.
The original studies were
done in the 1980s, when the University of Kansas analyzed verbal interactions
in professional, middle-class, and low-income families with children who were
just learning language.
There were many
similarities among the families. Parents all showed affection, disciplined
their children, and tried to teach them good manners, but the social-class
differences in the number of words children heard each hour were dramatic:
2,150 in professional families, 1,250 in middle-class families, and 620 in poor
families.
With few exceptions, the
more parents talked to their children, the faster the children’s vocabularies
grew and the higher the children’s I.Q. test scores were at age 3 and later.
More-affluent parents
used a wider range of nouns, modifiers, and past-tense verbs, and more of the
conversations were initiated by children.
Families that talk a
lot also talk about more different things. They use more grammatical variety in
their sentences and more sophisticated vocabulary and produce more utterances
in connected chains.
These parents ask their
children a lot of questions and have fun answering children’s “Why?” questions.
There’s also a
difference in the ratio of statements from parents that are affirming and positive
(Yes, it is a bunny!) versus corrective and critical (Stop that!): 32 to 5 per
hour in professional homes, 12 to 7 in working-class homes, 5 to 11 in low-income
homes.
Poor nutrition, chaotic
living conditions, no preschool also influence poor students’ literacy deficits.
There is also variation
within each social-class group, for example, some wealthy families have low word
counts.
The quality of spoken
words is as important as quantity. It’s important that parent and child are
both paying attention to and talking about the same thing – a cement mixer on
the street, a picture in a book – and the ensuing conversation and gestures are
fluid and continue over time.
Though cultural factors
may well explain why some low-income parents talk relatively little with their
toddlers, the most obvious explanation is poverty itself. When daily life is
stressful and uncertain and dispiriting, it can be difficult to summon up the
patience and the playfulness for an open-ended conversation with a small, persistent,
possibly whiny child.
In addition, poorer
families may be unconsciously preparing their children for jobs and lives in which
they won’t have much power and autonomy – hence the high value on discipline
and respect for parental authority.
The 2003 study Unequal Childhoods found that
middle-class families mostly practiced “concerted cultivation” – adults engaging
children in lots of back-and-forth conversation, with the verbal jousting
giving kids intellectual confidence.
Working-class and poor
families, on the other hand, tend to take an “accomplishment of natural growth”
approach – children’s lives are less customized, discipline consists of
directives and sometimes threats of physical punishment, and there is less talk
and less drawing out of children’s opinions.
The middle-class
approach takes a lot of parents’ time, and some sibling interactions are
mean-spirited. The study found that poor and working-class children were more
polite to adults, less whiny, more competent, and more independent. Still, middle-class
families’ approach prepared their children better for success in school and
professional careers. It taught children to debate, extemporize, and advocate
for themselves, and it helped them develop the vocabulary that tends to reap
academic rewards.
Another variable is
parents’ educational background. Asking dinner-table questions like, “Hey, did
you hear the blue whales are making a comeback off California?” or “Oh, they
just discovered a new dinosaur” spring from more years in school and college,
but also from a different mode of inquiry that’s more in synch with the way
teachers talk – more abstract, better informed, more inquisitive. Education
helps you learn how to make yourself clear to people who are outside your point
of view.
No comments:
Post a Comment